Startups Launching at TechCrunch50 and DEMO Fall 2008

September 8, 2008

Launching a startup at a big event is a great idea. There are many advantages.

  1. Hard Launch Date: Launching at an event forces you to launch. There are many examples of startups that delay their launch (several times over) because they can. An event means you’ve got to launch. Granted, I’ve seen a lot of startups launch at events, and they’re not really launching … they’re announcing the upcoming possibility of a beta product, sometime in the near future, maybe. That’s not really launching and in my mind, shouldn’t be allowed at events like TechCrunch50 or DEMO.
  2. Lots of Press: You can’t go wrong with some buzz, and the more the merrier. PR can be a huge boon to a startup, and there’s no better way to kickstart things than with a well-publicized event. Of course, the event buzz will die fast (it almost always does), so you need a plan for maintaining and leveraging that press and buzz going forward.
  3. Lots of Networking: Put hundreds or thousands of people in a room, all there to live and breathe startups for a few days, and the opportunities are almost endless. You won’t get a similar opportunity, and you’re in the spotlight, so you have to take advantage. I would recommend that every startup have a plan of attack for who they want to speak to, why and how. Don’t just assume you can walk around and meet people randomly, have a strategy in place.
  4. Getting on Stage: For a lot of people this is a scarier proposition than death. And it is scary. But once you’ve gone on stage in front of hundreds of people to pitch your startup dream, you’ll find it gets infinitely easier. I cringe a bit watching our presentation at DEMO 2008, but the confidence I gained from that is immeasurable.
  5. Line in the Sand: Launching at an event creates a more marked point in time whereby you can distinctly say, “We’ve launched.” It’s almost like your startup has two lives – Before Launch and After Launch. If you recognize this fact, and don’t get bogged down in obsessing solely about the launch, you’ll be very ready and eager to get past the launch into the real business of making your startup a success.

Launching at a big event is all about focus. It focuses you on a point in time, it focuses your product development (because you can’t keep building forever and ever), it focuses your presentation skills, and brings a lot of things to bear all at once. It can be extremely nerve-wracking but I believe it’s 100% worth it.

Standout Jobs Launched at DEMO 2008

I look back fondly on our DEMO launch at the end of January. It was a great experience for me, my co-founders and the entire team. It still carries weight when we speak to people (be they investors, customers, potential partners, etc.) and cements in our minds a certain amount of success: we rushed, we ran, we screamed, we panicked … and we launched. I don’t hang my hat on that, but it was still worth it.

TechCrunch50 vs. DEMO

TechCrunch50 vs. DEMO

This is a crappy debate. I find Robert Scoble’s post about the crappy websites of the DEMO companies particularly embarrassing and pointless. What’s the point of dissing those companies? Without getting into it further, I don’t get it.

DEMO is expensive. There’s no doubt about it. It costs $18,000 to present as a company, and then there’s the cost of travel, marketing materials, etc. Given the TechCrunch50 competition, I really don’t know what DEMO will do; maybe they’ll lower their fees, maybe they won’t. I do know DEMO puts on one heck of a professional show. Is it worth it? That depends on a lot of factors, and I can’t possibly tell you one way or the other in a simple blog post.

And remember, TC50 charges for Demo Pit slots, and they make a lot of money from the conference, so I don’t look at cost as being such a huge differentiator.

How are companies picked to attend TC50 and DEMO?

Is it a truly fair, open and honest selection process? No. It can’t be. Humans run both events, and humans are human. I know the selection process is extremely difficult – both conferences get tons of applications – and have to go through them painstakingly. But over all the arguing and blustering over costs, etc. I don’t think either conference can truly say that they absolutely picked the best companies to present. There are always going to be outside influences that affect decision-making. That’s human nature. I look at the debate and arguing and just throw up my hands; it’s silly and serves no one (well, it does build buzz for people so that’s a good thing – and truth be told might even benefit the startups at both events!) Just don’t assume that one conference has a more fair and open selection process versus the other.

TechCrunch50 has the Advantage

Without a doubt, TC50 has the advantage. TechCrunch (and those involved outside of the TechCrunch people) have built up a huge community; and that community will drive TC50’s success in a big way. The buzz is huge around TC50. It has a ton of experts that people want to see. As exciting as it will be for attendees to see 52 new companies launch, I’m sure many are going to see the experts and meet them as well. TC50 plays to its strengths very well, and has done a good job of making a lot of noise and pulling things together.

What about the startups?

The startups need to stay focused. Launch your company – do it as loud and proud as you can – and leverage the absolute heck out of it, whether you’re at DEMO or TC50. Allen Stern makes the point very clearly, “Stay out of the drama.” I think that will be easier said than done, and I suspect that the folks at DEMO are going to get asked a lot about “DEMO vs. TC50″ … and the TC50 companies less so. It’s a difficult, frustrating and in my mind, pointless situation. I’d like to see both conferences succeed and find their place — and most importantly, truly benefit startups.

I wish all the startups the best of luck. No matter what, presenting at a big event is a great way to launch, and take as much from it as you can. Milk it for all it’s worth and then move on as fast as you can … you’ve got a business to run.

Please share this post via email, Twitter, Facebook, etc. Click the tweet button to the left or click here: To follow me on Twitter click here. To subscribe via RSS click here.

  • I agree that TechCrunch50 has the Advantage as compared to DEMO. Great information.
  • Launching at an event is a great way to get a head-start, as you already have some inherent publicity. I wish I could have done that.
  • I wish I had the opportunity to launch my startup back in the day at Techcrunch.... Goodluck
  • Another way I'm thinking TC50 will likely be different: I suspect many more of their presenters will be Bay Area based. DEMO has long prided itself in its companies being from all over the U.S., and increasingly the world. (See my last post for the number of countries this year's DEMOfall class will be from.) We'll see how TC50's companies stack up in this regard next week.:)
  • Without a doubt TC50 is more Bay Area-centric. But they did have some companies from overseas and Canada. I would like to see more international discovery of startups over time at every event. It creates a lot more opportunity for everyone involved.
  • I know it costs a lot of money to be involved with these events but I think if you've got even a semi decent business model then the return you would get on your money would be good (as long as you do a good job running the business after launch!).
  • Look into Alexa of last years' presenting companies and see how little the effect was for most companies.
    Or this time:
    http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_detai...
    See any surge of interest on Alexa?
  • I agree that for Standout, the DEMO presentation didn't result in a huge spike of sustained traffic. But we're also a B2B play that's of less interest to the early adopters and the masses. I would imagine B2C plays did see bigger traffic spikes initially. Doesn't mean they sustained them.

    I don't think anyone would argue that presenting at DEMO or TC50 is a panacea; that all you have to do is get on stage and your worries are over - but I do think it helps in a number of ways to launch a company in a concerted effort at an event like that.

    Thanks for stopping by and commenting, I appreciate it.
  • I've in the past written some keys as to why start-ups fail on my own blog. I do like the idea of a big formal launch event, either at a conference, or awards event, however, this isn't always as easy as it seems, and typically can cost valuable dollars that Start-ups might not be willing to spend.

    When I was at Crosswalk, we tried to re-launch the company at Super Computing '06, I think we ended up spending roughly $400.000 between booths, lanyard sponsorship, etc. We even won an award (or rather bought an award). In the end, it didn't help us gain any additional prospects.

    Here is a link to one of the start-up write-ups I've done.

    http://thesantechnologist.com/?p=35
  • Can be distracting from conducting the core operations of your business though.
  • As a webmaster who cannot afford the 18k, I would be interested to know wfo and how the people from TC50 and DEMO fared. How much money, and how likely is a small website with a kick-ass marketing plan to get funded?
  • I totally agree.. Launching your start up at a big even like this will greatly improve your companies chance of succeeding. This is a great opportunity to get you name out there.
  • This is very interesting, thanks a lot !
  • yep great news
  • Launching at a conference definitely helps you to get things done faster rather than lazing around waiting for things to be perfect. However, there is a downside of it as well. People might be rushing for the deadline without focusing on details that might tarnish the reputation of the new startup.
  • Great Article, look cool
  • either at a conference, or awards event, however, this isn't always as easy as it seems, and typically can cost valuable dollars that Start-ups might not be willing to spend.
  • Very intersting and helpful article! Thanks for sharing!
  • You are speaking about outside influences that may affect decision-making. What influences do you mean namely? While keeping a clean slate I suspect there is a lot of money involved, isn't it? After all that's human nature.
  • Wow, I admire what you have done with this your blog. I like the part where you say you are doing this to give back but I would assume by all the comments that this is working for you as well.
  • Michele
    Hi could you please tell me the costs to present a company at Techcrunch 50?
  • The TechCrunch conference is free, unless you're in the demo pit. You should visit their site for pricing details. And pricing may change next year too.
blog comments powered by Disqus