Comments on: PayPerPost Buys Pieces of Performancing.com http://www.instigatorblog.com/payperpost-buys-pieces-of-performancingcom/2006/12/28/ Startups, entrepreneurship, business and social media Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:58:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Paisley http://www.instigatorblog.com/payperpost-buys-pieces-of-performancingcom/2006/12/28/comment-page-1/#comment-105087 Paisley Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:42:11 +0000 http://www.instigatorblog.com/payperpost-buys-pieces-of-performancingcom/2006/12/28/#comment-105087 The problem is that PayPerPost makes up the rules as they go along. There is no consistency anywhere. The company puts out the advertisements and then changes the rules once one posts their blog by claiming it was preceded by another PPP post or it doesn't have the right links when it obviously does, or the page isn't the right color. Take your pick. PPP is as anal as a jackass. <a href="http://Performance.com">Performance.com</a> would do well to stay as far away from PayPerPost as possible. This is coming from someone who tries to write for them yet is consistently caught in the change-of-minds of the program. <br><br>I write for various companies including myself as a freelance writer and novelist in addition to beta testing and product reviews. You can be certain that I have more on my blog than all PayPerPost media-BS yet their reviewers claim otherwise. It is getting to the point where it is not worth writing for them at all even if they do pay out regularly. <br><br>Personally, as a professional writer, I do not consider myself as a ad-hog writer but I thought it would be nice to write about companies and products I use, I research, or I hear great things about throughout my personal life. It would be great if I manage to get beyond those who would rather make my life a living hell by proclaiming something, even the tiniest thing is not to the posts' review "expert" and I use that term lightly because there are no experts within the executive or worker bee ranks of PayPerPost. They all left or never existed in the first place. The problem is that PayPerPost makes up the rules as they go along. There is no consistency anywhere. The company puts out the advertisements and then changes the rules once one posts their blog by claiming it was preceded by another PPP post or it doesn't have the right links when it obviously does, or the page isn't the right color. Take your pick. PPP is as anal as a jackass. Performance.com would do well to stay as far away from PayPerPost as possible. This is coming from someone who tries to write for them yet is consistently caught in the change-of-minds of the program.

I write for various companies including myself as a freelance writer and novelist in addition to beta testing and product reviews. You can be certain that I have more on my blog than all PayPerPost media-BS yet their reviewers claim otherwise. It is getting to the point where it is not worth writing for them at all even if they do pay out regularly.

Personally, as a professional writer, I do not consider myself as a ad-hog writer but I thought it would be nice to write about companies and products I use, I research, or I hear great things about throughout my personal life. It would be great if I manage to get beyond those who would rather make my life a living hell by proclaiming something, even the tiniest thing is not to the posts' review “expert” and I use that term lightly because there are no experts within the executive or worker bee ranks of PayPerPost. They all left or never existed in the first place.

]]> By: Paisley http://www.instigatorblog.com/payperpost-buys-pieces-of-performancingcom/2006/12/28/comment-page-1/#comment-12004 Paisley Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:42:11 +0000 http://www.instigatorblog.com/payperpost-buys-pieces-of-performancingcom/2006/12/28/#comment-12004 The problem is that PayPerPost makes up the rules as they go along. There is no consistency anywhere. The company puts out the advertisements and then changes the rules once one posts their blog by claiming it was preceded by another PPP post or it doesn't have the right links when it obviously does, or the page isn't the right color. Take your pick. PPP is as anal as a jackass. Performance.com would do well to stay as far away from PayPerPost as possible. This is coming from someone who tries to write for them yet is consistently caught in the change-of-minds of the program. I write for various companies including myself as a freelance writer and novelist in addition to beta testing and product reviews. You can be certain that I have more on my blog than all PayPerPost media-BS yet their reviewers claim otherwise. It is getting to the point where it is not worth writing for them at all even if they do pay out regularly. Personally, as a professional writer, I do not consider myself as a ad-hog writer but I thought it would be nice to write about companies and products I use, I research, or I hear great things about throughout my personal life. It would be great if I manage to get beyond those who would rather make my life a living hell by proclaiming something, even the tiniest thing is not to the posts' review "expert" and I use that term lightly because there are no experts within the executive or worker bee ranks of PayPerPost. They all left or never existed in the first place. The problem is that PayPerPost makes up the rules as they go along. There is no consistency anywhere. The company puts out the advertisements and then changes the rules once one posts their blog by claiming it was preceded by another PPP post or it doesn’t have the right links when it obviously does, or the page isn’t the right color. Take your pick. PPP is as anal as a jackass. Performance.com would do well to stay as far away from PayPerPost as possible. This is coming from someone who tries to write for them yet is consistently caught in the change-of-minds of the program.

I write for various companies including myself as a freelance writer and novelist in addition to beta testing and product reviews. You can be certain that I have more on my blog than all PayPerPost media-BS yet their reviewers claim otherwise. It is getting to the point where it is not worth writing for them at all even if they do pay out regularly.

Personally, as a professional writer, I do not consider myself as a ad-hog writer but I thought it would be nice to write about companies and products I use, I research, or I hear great things about throughout my personal life. It would be great if I manage to get beyond those who would rather make my life a living hell by proclaiming something, even the tiniest thing is not to the posts’ review “expert” and I use that term lightly because there are no experts within the executive or worker bee ranks of PayPerPost. They all left or never existed in the first place.

]]> By: Performancing and PayPerPost Hop Out of Bed » Instigator Blog http://www.instigatorblog.com/payperpost-buys-pieces-of-performancingcom/2006/12/28/comment-page-1/#comment-2048 Performancing and PayPerPost Hop Out of Bed » Instigator Blog Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:32:53 +0000 http://www.instigatorblog.com/payperpost-buys-pieces-of-performancingcom/2006/12/28/#comment-2048 [...] I wrote about the deal between PayPerPost and Performancing when it came out because I’m interested in both companies and in particular wanted to see what PayPerPost would do with the acquisitions, and what the response would be from the blogosphere. [...] [...] I wrote about the deal between PayPerPost and Performancing when it came out because I’m interested in both companies and in particular wanted to see what PayPerPost would do with the acquisitions, and what the response would be from the blogosphere. [...]

]]> By: Practical Blogging » Blog Archive » PayPerPost Just Bought Performancing http://www.instigatorblog.com/payperpost-buys-pieces-of-performancingcom/2006/12/28/comment-page-1/#comment-1782 Practical Blogging » Blog Archive » PayPerPost Just Bought Performancing Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:49:00 +0000 http://www.instigatorblog.com/payperpost-buys-pieces-of-performancingcom/2006/12/28/#comment-1782 [...] (via Renata and Ben) [...] [...] (via Renata and Ben) [...]

]]>