Competitive Research 101 for Startups


Whenever I get pitched by a startup, I always look to see if they’ve properly identified the competition. For starters, I can guarantee you that someone is already working on the same idea. It’s a universal truth. But more importantly than that, competitive research and analysis is one of those areas that is often horribly lacking from any pitch. There are a few reasons for this:

  1. Entrepreneurs don’t want to know. Nobody likes to find a bunch of competitors doing the same (or nearly the same) thing. So entrepreneurs put blinders on.
  2. Entrepreneurs are thinking too small. This is too often the case in Montreal, where entrepreneurs think of Quebec as a market. Even looking at your local market as an entry point is risky if you haven’t done your homework elsewhere.
  3. Entrepreneurs have big egos, which makes them believe what they’re doing is unique and awesome. Egos are needed, but not if they blind you completely.
  4. Entrepreneurs don’t bother looking. This comes down to not tackling your startup in a diligent, rigorous manner. Too often entrepreneurs get an idea, think they’ve hit a home run and start running wildly (in any and all directions.)

The existence of competition should not (necessarily) stop you from starting your company. It should color your thinking, create the appropriate context and help educate you on what’s going on in the market. And it’s one of the first places investors will look to help educate themselves on the market. Most investors aren’t experts in every market they invest in (they may not be experts in any of the markets!), and so a big part of their due diligence up front is to check out the competition.

This happened to me just a few days ago. I received a pitch, looked at it, and started doing some quick research. This is usually the first thing I do if the pitch gets passed my basic “sniff test” judgement (i.e. does it make any sense at all?) In this case I knew of at least one competitor. That’s going to happen a lot when pitching investors – they see a ton of deals – so they have cursory knowledge on a lot of companies. Then I went to Google and tried a couple of relevant search terms. In this particular case, one of the top 3 listings looked like a competitor. I checked them out and it seemed very similar. I saw a few other ancillary competitors as well. This took no more than 10-15 minutes.

I emailed the entrepreneur asking about competition. I listed a couple of references, including the one that looked like a direct match. I asked flat out, “What’s the difference between you and Competitor X?” He replied:

Not much. Fuck.

He followed that up with a more detailed comparison (after he spent some time looking at the competitor), but this essentially kills it for me. The fact that this entrepreneur hadn’t really looked at this competitor – which I had found in 10 minutes with very little understanding of his market – is really bad news. And before you think this is unique to this guy, it’s not. This happens all the time!

Competitive research is an important point of due diligence for investors. More importantly, you need to do it for your own edification. You need to demonstrate and actually have a level of expertise in your market that’s both broad and deep. Domain knowledge is a key advantage; and I bundle in competitive knowledge as a key component of that.

These days I use Crunchbase for competitive research. The profiles in there are often quite detailed and some of them have links to other competitors. With one competitor’s name you can typically find a bunch of others. AngelList is also extremely useful (although a lot of the information is probably hidden to entrepreneurs.) Try Quora as well. And Google almost always returns interesting results. Find a competitor’s name and type in, “[company name] competitors”.

Do your homework. Know your competitors and how you differentiate from them. This isn’t the crux of your pitch to investors, but it’s gotta be there. If a prospective investor (or customer, partner, etc.) can find a competitor in 10 minutes and you don’t really know who they are and how you stand against them, you’re in serious trouble.

If you enjoyed this post, please share it!

No related posts.

August 30, 2011 Posted in Startups by

  • http://www.techentrepreneurship.com Helge Seetzen

    It’s amazing how often this happens. As an entrepreneur you only really have three measurable qualifications:
    1. You have demonstrated the repeated ability to build profitable stable companies or high return exits.
    2. You absolutely own your domain in terms of technology, market players and user/customer dynamics.
    3. You can attract high value talent with the above 2 sklls for equity.

    The first is rare in the fundraising context (less than 5% of the pitches that I receive as an Angel have founders who have already got one or more big successes). The last is really an indirect measure of the first two. So often the middle item is the only way to show your capabilities. Like you, I quickly stop listening when that domain expertise isn’t visible (and limited market space knowledge is often the first indicator).

  • Anonymous

    Nice pos

  • Anonymous

    Very nice article,

    My blog | http://www.rebirthhiphop.com

  • http://twitter.com/krenzsin Resume Sample

    Enjoyed reading your article…very nice tips….:)
    One may also check my blog  …. http://sampleresumes-sampleresume.blogspot.com/

  • Anonymous

    As a new or aspiring business owner, managing each
    business task is a big deal. Therefore,proper scheduling and planning of work
    is essential to meet the business needs.

  • http://onemessagepage.com MarecOne

    Yes it happens. Been there done that.

  • Nazia21

    I have something to say over this blog that this is
    an admirable what you have done here. It is pleasing to look you express from
    the heart and your clarity on this significant content can be easily looked.
    Remarkable post and will look forward to your future update.
     

    Olive Garden coupons

  • http://www.microsourcing.com/ MicroSourcing

    Ego is the biggest reason why start-ups refuse to acknowledge  competitors. Some also think that if they pitch a start-up and make the admission that there are others doing the same thing, it lessens their start-ups value. They think they have a better chance of getting investors to say yes if they’re pitching an original idea.

  • keba

    very grate post and i think this title

  • http://andynathan.net MichaelBOtto

    Great tips for investors!

  • Pingback: Competitive Research 101 for Startups « Hi there!

  • Pingback: Twitter Link Roundup #105 – Small Business, Social Media, Design, Copywriting, Marketing And More « crowdSPRING Blog

  • Pingback: Twitter Link Roundup #105 – Small Business, Social Media, Design, Copywriting, Marketing And More

About Ben Yoskovitz
I recently joined GoInstant as VP Product. GoInstant changes how we use the web, making it shareable like never before.

I'm also a Founding Partner at Year One Labs, an early stage accelerator in Montreal. Previously I founded Standout Jobs (and sold it). I'm a hands-on startup guy, helping companies grow successfully from the idea forward. You can reach me at byosko at gmail dot com.

Follow Ben on TwitterFollow this blog via email
Startup Tools
Find Stuff
Please Check Out:
NextMontreal.com I Spy Montreal
Disclaimer
The opinions and commentary on this site are mine and mine alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions or positions of my employer, GoInstant.