A Glimpse Into The Suffering of Venture Capitalists

August 6, 2007

Last week I attended Always On at Stanford University, a great conference on Web and technology. There was a broad mix of attendees: venture capitalists, entrepreneurs, technologists, media, etc.

I met a number interesting companies, including goChongo and ThinkFree. I also watched a great panel discussion on venture capital with Roger McNamee (Elevation), Erik Straser (MDV), Paul Deninger (Jefferies) and Bill Gurley (Benchmark).

It was an interesting debate, at times somewhat heated, and very informative. I would have preferred if they had focused more specifically on startups and early stage funding. Paul Kedrosky nailed it when he wrote, “It is an entertaining wander through technology, innovation, and capital markets — even if I wished they’d shut up about SarbOx already.”

Sarbanes-Oxley is simply not on the radar of most (if any) startups. And I’m not sure it has to be.

Of particular interest for startups was the discussion of M&A activity, and how the bulk of mid-sized deals are disappearing – in the $50 million to $200 million range. The most common deals these days are the smaller ones or the bigger ones. General consensus amongst the VC panel was that companies shouldn’t build themselves to flip in a short time, they better be prepared for a longer haul.

Personally, I see a ton of M&A activity, but what most of us non-VCs don’t see are the deals that didn’t happen.

Meanwhile, I’m strolling through the crowds at AlwaysOn when I see a VC I want to speak to. He’s someone I’ve spoken to before, so this was just a quick follow-up. More a “thank you for the advice” than anything.

We’re barely 10 seconds into our conversation when a large, sweaty fellow waddles up close and starts pitching. He barely introduces himself, he just launches into the pitch. And it’s not a very good one either.

The VC is already looking into space. He’s so disinterested a blind bat could notice. Not the guy pitching. He just keeps on trucking.

I jump in for half a second to wish the VC well and move on. I have no clue how it ended. I’d guess that the VC interrupted the guy pretty quickly and ran for the hills.

I wonder how often that happens to VCs?

Quite a bit, I’d bet. Granted, it’s part of the business. And I’m sure they’re used to it, but just for a moment I felt the VC’s pain. Pitching venture capitalists isn’t easy. But there are some basics of human communication that are fairly obvious, and some basics of how to approach people – in general – that you shouldn’t mess with.

  • Interrupting other people is rude.
  • Launching into a pitch is rude.
  • Droning on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on is rude. And stupid.

The basic rules of engagement and communication should always apply, even if you’re pitching venture capitalists. Be clear. Be concise. Be precise. Be nice. Use common sense. Of course common sense isn’t particularly common, but that’s a story for another day…

Please share this post via email, Twitter, Facebook, etc. Click the tweet button to the left or click here: To follow me on Twitter click here. To subscribe via RSS click here.

  • Mat
    It amazes me that more people aren't familiar with the basics of human communication.

    But I think I'll hold off on my pity for VCs though ;)
  • First of all, these events at Stanford are great! Attended many of them and I just miss them.

    While I was in California, I’ve been pitched so many times like that myself. Annoying. I’ve also seen many VCs being rudely pitched like that. I guess it’s how the Valley is :)
  • It is amazing to see how often this applies with Journalists, bloggers and media folk.

    People interrupt and start pitching. In reality the more important aspect of meeting these folks is in building the relationship and if you've screwed that from the get go it doesn't matter how good your pitch is.

    And Carl, I don't think it is how the Valley is. There are a lot of really nice people here. Probably what you are seeing is just due to VC fever running rampant in the area. If you get such a high percentage of people looking for the funding you are bound to get a higher number of rude people. The nice people just don't get noticed.
  • Jonathan,

    Don't worry. I know how great the Valley people are! Seriously. As you said, many VCs + many entrepreneurs = a few jackasses!
  • Thats pretty painful. I would say a lot of VCs have ADD anyway, they aren't listening to most of the pitches anyway. I hope I'm not perceived that way when pitching.

    Share your passionate startup stories
    http://startupflames.com
  • @Mat - I completely understand your lack of pity for VCs. But eventually I'll write a post about getting pitched myself, which has started happening. And being somewhat on the other side of the fence is interesting and challenging.
  • @Carl - I think your first comment was taken a bit out of context by Jonathan, but I'm glad he commented nonetheless to expand on your thoughts.

    Really what it comes down to is an overwhelming, over abundance of pitching. Everyone's pitching something and it's tiring.

    At AlwaysOn I had to sit down and just close my eyes for a bit...I was pitching, others were pitching...we might as well be throwing baseballs at each other's heads. It's tough.

    @Jonathan - Thanks for stopping by! Most of the people I met in SF were extremely friendly. Stick around for a follow up blog post (hopefully tomorrow) about that very thing - the openness, availability and participation of everyone (including A-listers, "stars", top-notch VCs, etc.) is amazing. And that's sorely lacking elsewhere.
  • Ok, maybe I got a bit defensive;)
  • @Jonathan - I don't think you got that defensive. A lot of people might think the folks in Silicon Valley aren't friendly, or maybe they're ruthless...or something negative. Generally I didn't find that to be the case at all.
  • I appreciate your comments about people who practice and deliver those annoying "elevator pitches" at every seeming opportunity. Back around 99 dotcom wannabes spent hundreds of dollars for weekend workshops on perfecting them. My feeling was always that if someone isn't willing to grant you five minutes to present your case then they are not really interested. Don't try to shove your elevator pitch down their throats without permission.
  • Great post. I went to AO last year and back in 2003. Very cool event and a nice opportunity for some "Valley immersion". You're right that some entrepreneurs are rude in forcing their pitches down the VCs' throats .

    But as a VC we need not forget that it is our job to listen to pitches and I tend to feel that hearing a pitch is a privilege, not a favour I'm granting someone. Like it or not, entrepreneurs and their ideas are the "raw material" of our trade and should be respected as such... even if the investment is very clearly not for my firm.

    But then again, I'm not in the Valley and I don't get pitched to every time I ride the elevator...
  • Hi David - Thanks for commenting. Your perspective is a good one, there can't be any successful VCs without successful entrepreneurs. The reverse isn't quite as true...
blog comments powered by Disqus