7 Ways To Avoid Pointless Meetings

February 20, 2007

Generally, meetings suck. We all accept that as truth but we have them anyway. Endless, endless meetings…

I think we’re addicted.

Given our love for meetings, we need to make them more effective. Having recently “enjoyed” several truly pointless meetings, I know there’s a better way.

The easiest answer is: “don’t have them at all.” That might work, but generally that’s impossible. So…

  1. Make sure the meeting has a clear purpose. If I could scream this, I would: “What is the purpose of this meeting?” If you can’t define the purpose clearly, or you’re obfuscating it in order to get me into the meeting then shame on you.
  2. Avoid suspense. There’s no place in meetings for suspense. Whether you’re delivering bad news or good news – just get to the point. You can explain all the circumstances of your news after the fact, but don’t keep people sitting around waiting.
  3. Document what’s going on. The best thing about a meeting is not remembering what was talked about 5 minutes after it was finished. I suppose to avoid pointless meetings I could say, “be remarkable and memorable” but barring that, pick one person as secretary and have them distribute their notes later on.
  4. Avoid distractions. Every meeting has at least one guy that’s distracted by something. He’s looking at his computer screen, staring out the window, signaling to people walking by the conference room, or picking his nose. Boot his butt out of there, he’s Mr. Pointless Meeting.
  5. Have an agenda. This won’t work for impromptu meetings, but an agenda is a very good way to keep people on track. Distribute it beforehand. Don’t ask for everyone’s approval. If you do, and don’t get it, you’ll have a harder time following the agenda. Agendas are an opt-out effort; if someone doesn’t put in suggestions or request changes (or respond in any way) they’ve – by default – accepted the agenda.
  6. Avoid regular meetings if there’s no agenda. Following point #4, if you’re having a regular, weekly meeting but there’s no agenda, why have the meeting? If you say “habit” then poke yourself in the eye. Meetings aren’t meant to satisfy your need for organization and habitual, mindless behaviors; they’re there to solve problems.
  7. Schedule something critical right after. If you have the sense that a meeting may be pointless schedule something important right after. Tell the attendees as soon as you get in there, so you’ve got an escape route setup. You could always fake it, or even have someone call you during the meeting to get out, but it’s much more effective if you legitimately have to move on. It’ll help you keep others focused, moving through the agenda and accomplishing something.

Meetings don’t have to suck.

Many of them do, and our corporate culture seems bent on enforcing as many hours of meetings as possible. But there are better ways.

What are your tips and tricks for having effective meetings and avoiding the bad ones?

Please share this post via email, Twitter, Facebook, etc. Click the tweet button to the left or click here: To follow me on Twitter click here. To subscribe via RSS click here.

  • I would add that you can try having a "stand up" meeting. This is a meeting where nobody sits. It minimizes idleness and makes people motivated to end the meeting quicker!
  • I saw this yesterday and thought I would share: http://despair.com/meetings.html.
  • Lorna - that's great. So, so, so true...
  • Ben,

    This is a great post! Sometimes I feel like half of my waking hours are devoted to avoiding meetings. So little gets done there. The worst is when you're telecommuting and people want to drag you into the office for a "necessary" meeting. Fun!

    Take care,
    Andrew
  • Sounds like a very manager x type approach. They're dumb and won't pay attention or care about meetings. So, we're going to impose how it's done.
    Which is necessary for some people, but u might want to put in the caveat that it's not applicable to all management situations.
  • #8 - Don't expand the meeting to fill the timeslot.
    Good tips, but I have to say that when I had a job, I loved boring meetings :)
  • Great advice. I do think though that #5 should have some margin to bend. Some of the best thought-inspiring meetings I've been in have had a broad, over-arching agenda, but enough room for people to speak their mind and brainstorm. Few things are worse than staff who are unable to speak their minds because of a strict adherence to an agenda. Let staff open up and sidetrack once in awhile, then when it becomes counter-productive, pull everyone back to the center.
  • Ann
    If you can, stand up during the meeting. For some reason, this seems to speed them up, even if you arent next to a door.
  • Jon - shame on you for loving boring meetings! *laugh*

    Michael - I understand what you're saying. For me, it depends on the team. If they can handle the flexibility - more importantly if the leader of the meeting can handle the flexibility and control the meeting - it can work very well to have a looser agenda. If not, you get either chaos or atrophy.

    Ann - interesting tip. I'll give it a try next time. Maybe you command a bit more attention + focus while standing and it's harder to type on your BlackBerry under the desk while standing...
  • Ben, I've discovered that many come to meetings with agendas to crawl to the top at the expense of others. A different approach in coming to meetings is to lift up others who contribute great ideas rather than attempting to lift up oneself. What a difference it can make to your already great approaches for a successful committee meeting.
  • Nice post, Ben. I would add that it's important that somone in charge act as a moderator for the meeting to keep it on task. I take on this role with every client meeting I have. And when we go off topic, I know that I'm the one responsible for bring it back.

    I've played this role in strategic planning and organizational development meetings for larger organizations where you might have 20 principles in the meeting - all wanting to be heard. At that point, it's vital to have someone as moderator. And it should be known who that person is and their responsibilities before the meeting begins.
  • Dawud - I agree.

    The point is really - "Too many chiefs never works." You need people who are participating not all trying to lead.
  • I knew I was in trouble when I found myself in meetings about meetings or in other meetings where I sat for most of it wondering what the meeting was about.

    This issue is the number one source of pain and sense of being out of control for my executive clients.
  • Thought you might like this post that sums up the kind of people who inhabit meetings:

    http://www.randsinrepose.com/archives/2006/11/1...
  • Ha! Engtech - that's a great post. Laptop Larry is a bastard...but so are most of the others too...hhhmmm...
  • Great tips, thank you! Managing the meetings with purpose and establishing a decision making process upfront with clearly identified and agreed roles has worked for me. I have talked more about those tools in my post:

    http://blog.kitetail.com/2006/12/01/death-by-a-...
  • Binnur - thanks for the link and commenting. I agree with you that setting up roles and decision making processes helps - although we all know how things can collapse quickly!
  • Tim Morasle
    Nice note about meetings. I've been in so many pointless meetings... used to drive me nuts.

    Good point about the documentation. I use a software called meetings sense (http://www.meetingsense.com) which has automated the whole process. It also gives the option of setting a firm agenda to stop the soapboxers in their tracks :)
  • Tim Morasle
    sorry, link didn't work

    http://www.meetingsense.com
  • I just hate those meetings where the topic just diverted into no where and people just argue with each other over pointless things... Great article!
  • I thought this was gonna tell how to avoid going to pointless meetings.
blog comments powered by Disqus